Multiple rdfs:domain axioms are allowed and should be interpreted as a conjunction: these restrict the domain of the property to those individuals that belong to the intersection of the class descriptions. If one would want to say that multiple classes can act as domain, one should use a class description of the owl:unionOf form. For example, if we want to say that the domain of the property hasBankAccount can be either a Person or a Corporation, we would need to say something like this:

<owl:ObjectProperty rdf:ID="hasBankAccount">
  <rdfs:domain>
    <owl:Class>    
      <owl:unionOf rdf:parseType="Collection">
        <owl:Class rdf:about="#Person"/>
        <owl:Class rdf:about="#Corporation"/>
      </owl:unionOf>
    </owl:Class>    
  </rdfs:domain>
</owl:ObjectProperty>

NOTE: In OWL Lite the value of rdfs:domain must be a class identifier.

4.1.3 rdfs:range
For a property one can define (multiple) rdfs:range axioms. Syntactically, rdfs:range is a built-in property that links a property (some instance of the class rdf:Property) to to either a class description or a data range. An rdfs:range axiom asserts that the values of this property must belong to the class extension of the class description or to data values in the specified data range.

Multiple range restrictions are interpreted as stating that the range of the property is the intersection of all ranges (i.e., the intersection of the class extension of the class descriptions c.q. the intersection of the data ranges). Similar to rdfs:domain, multiple alternative ranges can be specified by using a class description of the owl:unionOf form (see the previous subsection).

我希望我的表述足够清晰。

在这里讨论就是想听听大家的意见，找到合适的方法。

请明者明示！

"are allowed and should be"  ------------- 关键

interpreted as a conjunction: these restrict the domain of the property to those individuals that belong to the intersection of the class descriptions. If one would want to say that multiple classes can act as domain,

"one should"     ------------- 关键

use a class description of the owl:unionOf form. For example, if we want to say that the domain of the property hasBankAccount can be either a Person or a Corporation, we would need to say something like this:

规范中说出现这种
Multiple rdfs:domain axioms
情况的时候
should
默认将这些Class以UnionOf的方式组合起来

如果不这样做是不符合owl规范的

问题是在不违反owl规范的情况下，如何解决楼主所提问题。如果强行按照规范执行上述编辑操作，其结果与本体构建的本意（语义）相背。

有没有其他的方法？或者不要在domain和range中强行定义，尝试在约束中定义？又或者强制一个ObjectProperty只能被引用一次（这样好像也不符合逻辑和现实情况，Protege得几个著名实例本体中ObjectProperty好像没有楼主所说的情况出现，它们也没有解决这个问题，不过那些构建本体的人肯定会遇到这个问题）？