新书推介:《语义网技术体系》
作者:瞿裕忠,胡伟,程龚
   XML论坛     W3CHINA.ORG讨论区     >>计算机科学论坛<<     SOAChina论坛     Blog     开放翻译计划     新浪微博  
 
  • 首页
  • 登录
  • 注册
  • 软件下载
  • 资料下载
  • 核心成员
  • 帮助
  •   Add to Google

    >> 本版讨论Semantic Web(语义Web,语义网或语义万维网, Web 3.0)及相关理论,如:Ontology(本体,本体论), OWL(Web Ontology Langauge,Web本体语言), Description Logic(DL, 描述逻辑),RDFa,Ontology Engineering等。
    [返回] 计算机科学论坛W3CHINA.ORG讨论区 - Web新技术讨论『 Semantic Web(语义Web)/描述逻辑/本体 』 → DL大牛Brachman谈SW研究与Internet热点之间的关系@ESWC07 查看新帖用户列表

      发表一个新主题  发表一个新投票  回复主题  (订阅本版) 您是本帖的第 2095 个阅读者浏览上一篇主题  刷新本主题   树形显示贴子 浏览下一篇主题
     * 贴子主题: DL大牛Brachman谈SW研究与Internet热点之间的关系@ESWC07 举报  打印  推荐  IE收藏夹 
       本主题类别:     
     zhaonix 帅哥哟,离线,有人找我吗?
      
      
      威望:2
      头衔:博士
      等级:研一(日夜苦读RDF Semantics)
      文章:242
      积分:3185
      门派:W3CHINA.ORG
      注册:2005/4/18

    姓名:(无权查看)
    城市:(无权查看)
    院校:(无权查看)
    给zhaonix发送一个短消息 把zhaonix加入好友 查看zhaonix的个人资料 搜索zhaonix在『 Semantic Web(语义Web)/描述逻辑/本体 』的所有贴子 点击这里发送电邮给zhaonix 引用回复这个贴子 回复这个贴子 查看zhaonix的博客楼主
    发贴心情 DL大牛Brachman谈SW研究与Internet热点之间的关系@ESWC07

    昨天看到,觉得有理:冷静,有点跳出SW看SW的味道。贴出来供大家参考。

    DL大牛Brachman在ESWC 2007上的invited talk《Emerging Sciences of the Internet= Some New Opportunities》谈到:Yahoo!、Google这样的互联网大牛们当前投入大量资源研究的方向是(他本人目前是a vice president of Yahoo! Research):
        search and information navigation (含Machine Learning),
        social and community systems,
        economic mechanisms for auctions and advertising, and
        media experiences
    建议SW界从这些方向中寻找自己的机会,而不要只盯着自己原来的 更加智能的搜索 那一个目标,这个目标 当前 并不被巨头们重视。

    下面是原文,来自http://www.eswc2007.org/pdf/eswc07-brachman.pdf
    -----------------
    Emerging Sciences of the Internet: Some New Opportunities
    (Extended Abstract)
    Ron Brachman
    Yahoo! Research, New York, NY 10011, USA
    rjb@yahoo-inc.com

    Semantic Web technologies have started to make a difference in enterprise set-
    tings and have begun to creep into use in limited parts of the World Wide
    Web. As is common in overview articles, it is easy to imagine scenarios in which
    the Semantic Web could provide important infrastructure for activities across
    the broader Internet. Many of these seem to be focused on improvements to
    what is essentially a search function (e.g., “list the prices of flat screen HDTVs
    larger than 40 inches with 1080p resolution at shops in the nearest town that
    are open until 8pm on Tuesday evenings”
    [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/
    Semantic Web]), and such capabilities will surely be of use to future Internet
    users. However, if one looks closely at the research agendas of some of the largest
    Internet companies, it is not clear that the staples of SW thinking will intersect
    the most important paths of the major broad-spectrum service providers. Some
    of the emerging trends in the research labs of key industry players indicate
    that SW goals generally taken for granted may be less central than envisioned
    and that the biggest opportunities may come from some less obvious directions.
    Given the level of investment and the global reach of big players like Yahoo!
    and Google, it would pay us to look more closely at some of their fundamental
    investigations.

    While not all companies see the future in the same way, there are some trends
    and priorities that are instructive to contemplate.WhileWeb search will continue
    to play a large role, and services composed from piece-parts offered by multiple
    vendors will be important, some relatively novel ideas may come to dominate. In
    one view, there will emerge a set of new sciences that are fundamental to future
    generations of Internet businesses. By understanding the imperatives of those
    new areas of thought, we may be able to get a better assessment of the true
    ultimate impact of SW technologies on the broader Internet. At the very least,
    framing future Semantic Web directions and examples in terms more aligned
    with some of these ideas may encourage more attention from some of the major
    Internet companies, which to date have shown only lukewarm interest.

    Search will continue to play a significant role for users of the Internet. While
    from a user’s perspective the most essential thing is the ability to find a website
    or document or element of data relevant to a task at hand, it is critical to
    the service provider that, in addition to producing relevant results, it be able to
    expose the user to advertisements well-suited to his or her immediate and longer-
    term needs and interests. While not restricted to search settings, high-quality
    matching of ads is critical to the continued success and growth of the major
    Internet search and content providers. In the long run, a better understanding
    of users in general and customers in specific is essential to providing a better
    experience and providing better opportunities through advertising. This is an
    area where a huge amount of investment is being made. Does it provide any
    interesting opportunities for SW technology?

    One interesting element here is that with the scale of the Web, companies are
    increasing their use of machine learning technologies to improve the performance
    of their search engines and other computing systems, since it is simply impossi-
    ble to process information at the scale and speed of the Web manually. Machine
    learning technology, based ultimately on richer knowledge representation tech-
    nologies, will play an extremely prominent role in the infrastructure that makes
    the Web successful in the future. Will this development provide interesting op-
    portunities for the Semantic Web community? Can it avoid the relative lack of
    mutual interest that has plagued the KR and ML communities in the recent
    past?

    Another emerging element in what we might call a new Science of Search is
    a social one. Products like Yahoo! Answers add the human element back into
    the process of finding relevant information. A similar human element pervades
    tagging-based services like Flickr. It’s not clear what the success of large-scale
    popular web services based on ad hoc human tagging says about the future
    of the Semantic Web - are the two incompatible? Will ontologies matter or
    do folksonomies rule? Others have begun to address the substantial differences
    between the social Web world and the Semantic Web world. While sometimes
    portrayed as diametrically opposed, the sides may benefit from each other if we
    look more deeply. My intuition is that there is room for synergy, and it would
    behoove us to investigate.

    The social element is evident in many areas other than Search. Community-
    oriented services are already extremely popular (witness the scale of MySpace
    and FaceBook, and even older services like Yahoo! Groups). On the face of it, this
    direction would seem not to hold much promise for SWthinking. But if one looks
    at some of the underlying infrastructure needed to make new community systems
    succeed, one sees opportunities for robust search and information extraction and
    organization technologies, among others.

    Another exciting and somewhat unexpected set of developments in new In-
    ternet science involves collaboration between Economics and Computer Science.
    Driven in part by underlying elements of advertising auctions that account for
    extraordinary revenue streams at Google, Yahoo!, and other companies, technical
    approaches to constructing novel market mechanisms, deploying them, and un-
    derstanding their practical ramifications are becoming critical. Prediction mar-
    kets and other novel mechanisms based on large-scale interactions among masses
    of people are creating never before seen opportunities because of the Internet,
    and substantial resources are going into the understanding of fundamental princi-
    ples governing such interactions. This whole line of thinking is not yet prominent
    in the worldview of the Web community, but it is likely to grow in importance,
    and it may provide some novel opportunities for SW research.

    Finally, as has been pointed out by many others, text-based documents are
    not the only media available on theWeb, and there has clearly been astronomical
    growth in user-generated non-textual content over the last few years. Podcast-
    ing, Flickr, YouTube, Yahoo! Video, and other media-sharing opportunities have
    shown that there is extraordinary latent interest in the creation and spread of
    audio, image, video and other complex content. While not yet receiving as much
    attention, the study and understanding of how users experience media, both
    individually and in social settings, is likely to lead to an explosion of novel tech-
    nologies and perhaps even devices for consuming and sharing media. How these
    new scientific directions will relate to the SW world is anyone’s guess, but it
    makes sense to take a close look to see what opportunities they present.

    It is clear that some very large players on the Internet are making substan-
    tial - in some cases huge - investments in novel forms of search and information
    navigation, social and community systems, economic mechanisms for auctions
    and advertising, and media experiences
    . With the scale of public interest and
    the level of economic investment we are now seeing, it is probable that these
    directions will have a dramatic impact on the evolution of the Internet. While
    many of the arenas traditionally targeted by the Semantic Web community will
    continue to matter in the next generation of the Web, it is conceivable that
    the really big interest, including the majority of investment and opportunity for
    broad influence on the world, will go elsewhere. It would be nice if the Seman-
    tic Web were not left behind. A quick look indicates that there could be some
    interesting opportunities, and it would appear to be very much worth the com-
    munity’s while to stop to consider the emerging sciences and their implications
    for future generations of the Internet.


       收藏   分享  
    顶(0)
      




    点击查看用户来源及管理<br>发贴IP:*.*.*.* 2007/12/13 9:15:00
     
     GoogleAdSense
      
      
      等级:大一新生
      文章:1
      积分:50
      门派:无门无派
      院校:未填写
      注册:2007-01-01
    给Google AdSense发送一个短消息 把Google AdSense加入好友 查看Google AdSense的个人资料 搜索Google AdSense在『 Semantic Web(语义Web)/描述逻辑/本体 』的所有贴子 点击这里发送电邮给Google AdSense 访问Google AdSense的主页 引用回复这个贴子 回复这个贴子 查看Google AdSense的博客广告
    2025/10/10 2:33:56

    本主题贴数1,分页: [1]

    管理选项修改tag | 锁定 | 解锁 | 提升 | 删除 | 移动 | 固顶 | 总固顶 | 奖励 | 惩罚 | 发布公告
    W3C Contributing Supporter! W 3 C h i n a ( since 2003 ) 旗 下 站 点
    苏ICP备05006046号《全国人大常委会关于维护互联网安全的决定》《计算机信息网络国际联网安全保护管理办法》
    78.125ms